Homepage – Blog

China Launches Shenzhou-20 Crew to Tiangong Space Station, Eyes Moon Mission by 2030

Science & Tech

-

April 24, 2025

China Launches Shenzhou-20 Crew to Tiangong Space Station, Eyes Moon Mission by 2030

China successfully launched three astronauts aboard the Shenzhou-20 spacecraft on Thursday, 24 April 2025, marking another major stride toward its goal of sending humans to the Moon within the next five years.

The spacecraft lifted off at 5:17 PM local time from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in the Gobi Desert, propelled by a Long March-2F rocket. This mission is China’s 15th crewed spaceflight and the 20th in its Shenzhou program, which began more than 30 years ago.

The Shenzhou-20 crew includes mission commander Chen Dong—now on his third flight—alongside first-time space travelers, engineer Wang Jie and fighter pilot Chen Zhongrui. They are set to replace the current trio aboard Tiangong, China’s independently built space station.

A New Power in Orbit

Tiangong, meaning “Heavenly Palace,” has cemented China’s role as a key player in space exploration. With China excluded from the International Space Station due to US national security concerns, the nation built its own orbital laboratory entirely from scratch. The station has been fully operational since 2022 and is capable of hosting up to six astronauts at once during crew handovers.

What’s Ahead

The Shenzhou-20 crew will spend roughly six months in orbit conducting medical and technological experiments, performing spacewalks, and maintaining and upgrading the station. Their arrival marks a brief overlap with the current crew, who are scheduled to return to Earth on 29 April after 175 days in space.

China’s space program, overseen by the People’s Liberation Army, has seen rapid progress since the country sent its first astronaut into orbit in 2003. It has since deployed a rover on the far side of the Moon and an explorer on Mars.

With the Moon as its next target, China aims to put astronauts on its surface by 2030—a mission that, if successful, would place it alongside the United States as the only nations to land humans on the Moon.

Kashmir’s Deadliest Civilian Attack in Years: 26 Tourists Killed in Pahalgam Ambush

World

admin staff

-

April 23, 2025

0

Kashmir’s Deadliest Civilian Attack in Years: 26 Tourists Killed in Pahalgam Ambush

A tranquil spring afternoon in Kashmir’s Pahalgam valley turned into a bloodbath on Tuesday when gunmen opened fire on a crowd of over 1,200 tourists, killing at least 26 people and injuring 17 in one of the worst attacks on civilians in the region in decades.

The incident took place in Baisaran, a scenic spot popularly known as “mini Switzerland”, nestled among snow-draped peaks and pine forests. Witnesses said the attackers, dressed in military-style clothing, appeared suddenly from the nearby forest and began shooting indiscriminately. The attack, which lasted 15–20 minutes, left victims sprawled across the meadow as others ran frantically for cover.

“It was like a storm,” a local pony service operator told AFP. “Sometimes a single shot, sometimes many bullets.”

Targeted and Ruthless

Survivors described the horror of watching friends and loved ones fall before their eyes. One woman said a gunman asked her husband if he was Muslim. When he said no, he was shot dead. Graphic images and videos showed bodies on the ground, women screaming, and locals trying to help the wounded—some of whom were transported to hospitals on horseback before military helicopters arrived.

A widely circulated photo shows the grieving wife sitting beside her husband’s lifeless body in shock.

Lapses in Security?

The attack has raised serious concerns over security arrangements in Pahalgam, a prominent tourist destination. Critics are questioning how such a brazen assault could happen in a region where the government has aggressively promoted tourism to demonstrate stability since the revocation of Kashmir’s special status in 2019.

Home minister Amit Shah rushed to Srinagar for emergency meetings. Prime minister Narendra Modi, who cut short a trip to Saudi Arabia, condemned the “heinous” act and vowed the perpetrators would be punished.

International Condemnation

Global leaders, including UN secretary general António Guterres, US vice president JD Vance, and Russian president Vladimir Putin, condemned the attack. The Resistance Front, linked to Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, reportedly claimed responsibility.

While gunfights with militants are not uncommon in Kashmir, attacks targeting tourists are rare. In recent years, over 20 million tourists visited the region annually. This tragedy could deal a severe blow to the perception of normalcy the government has tried to project.

As families mourn, the nation grapples with renewed fears and mounting pressure for accountability and decisive action.

Climate Controversy Engulfs Australian Opposition Leader Peter Dutton Amid Election Heat

World

admin staff

-

April 17, 2025

0

Climate Controversy Engulfs Australian Opposition Leader Peter Dutton Amid Election Heat

Australian opposition leader Peter Dutton is facing mounting criticism after his ambiguous comments on climate change during a live election debate sparked backlash from climate experts, campaigners, and political opponents. His remarks, questioning the role of human-driven climate change in Australia’s recent extreme weather events, have drawn sharp rebukes, just weeks before the country heads to the polls on 3 May.

In Tuesday’s nationally televised debate hosted by ABC News, Dutton hesitated when asked whether he believed Australia was currently experiencing the impacts of the climate crisis. Referring to extreme weather in his home state of Queensland, including flooding from Cyclone Alfred, he said: “I think you can see that there’s an impact,” but added, “I’ll let scientists and others pass that judgment.”

Pressed further, he responded, “I don’t know, David,” referencing the town of Thargomindah and suggesting that the public is equally unsure. His reluctance to acknowledge the scientific consensus shocked many observers, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who quipped: “Does he believe in gravity?”

Albanese called Dutton’s answers “stunning” and accused him of ignoring clear scientific evidence. “I would have thought the science is very clear on climate change,” he said at a press conference in Brisbane.

Environmental groups expressed similar alarm. The Climate Council called Dutton “out of touch” and urged him to engage with experts. “There is no excuse in 2025 for a potential Prime Minister not to be fully informed about the climate crisis,” said Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie.

The Australian Conservation Foundation went further, labeling his comments “deeply disturbing” and likening them to outdated climate denial. “Falling back on the old line – ‘I’m not a scientist’ – is simply unacceptable,” said ACF CEO Kelly O’Shanassy.

Australia has experienced a series of devastating climate events in recent years—from catastrophic bushfires and heatwaves to floods and coastal erosion. With two million homes and businesses now at moderate to high risk from climate-related disasters, the cost of inaction is growing. Insurance costs alone have surged by $30 billion in the past decade, with many households in vulnerable areas now unable to obtain coverage.

The climate crisis is emerging as a pivotal election issue, especially for younger voters and those in disaster-affected regions. While Dutton has pushed for nuclear energy and a review of Australia’s current emissions target of a 43% reduction by 2030, Labor is committed to stronger emissions cuts and expanding renewables.

Dutton has also said the Coalition would consider withdrawing Australia’s bid to co-host COP31, the 2026 UN climate summit, a proposal supported by Pacific island nations. Tuvalu’s climate minister, Maina Talia, warned that Dutton’s stance could jeopardize diplomatic ties, stating it “forced us to question the nature of our friendship” with Australia.

As public concern over climate intensifies, Dutton’s ambiguous stance may prove a decisive factor in the upcoming election—one where the future of Australia’s climate policy hangs in the balance.

Trump Blames Zelensky for Ukraine War After Deadly Russian Attack Kills 35

Politics

admin staff

-

April 15, 2025

0

Trump Blames Zelensky for Ukraine War After Deadly Russian Attack Kills 35

US President Donald Trump has ignited controversy by blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for starting the war with Russia, just a day after a devastating missile attack by Russian forces killed 35 civilians and injured 117 others in the Ukrainian city of Sumy.

In comments made at the White House on Monday, Trump accused Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and former US President Joe Biden of being collectively responsible for what he described as “millions of people dead.” He added, “You don’t start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.”

Trump’s remarks drew backlash for seemingly ignoring the fact that Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, years after first annexing Crimea in 2014. The death toll from the war, while catastrophic, is estimated in the hundreds of thousands—not millions.

While acknowledging the attack in Sumy as “terrible,” Trump downplayed it by claiming he was told Russia had “made a mistake,” without offering further details. In a shift of blame, he continued, “Biden could have stopped it, Zelensky could have stopped it, and Putin should have never started it. Everybody is to blame.”

Tensions between Trump and Zelensky have been high since their heated exchange in Washington in February, where Trump accused the Ukrainian leader of “gambling with World War Three” for not starting peace talks with Moscow sooner.

Trump also emphasized his improving relationship with Moscow, noting a “great” phone call with President Putin last month and revealing that the Russian leader sent him a portrait as a gift. The US also controversially sided with Russia in a UN vote in February that rejected a resolution naming Russia as the aggressor in the war.

Despite ongoing civilian deaths, including Sunday’s deadly missile strikes in Sumy that targeted civilians on Palm Sunday, Trump maintained that peace could be near. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, met with Putin in St Petersburg last week and said talks focused on a potential “permanent peace,” involving discussions on Russian-claimed Ukrainian territories and NATO’s Article 5 defense clause.

Ukrainian President Zelensky, speaking before the Sumy attack, urged Trump to visit Ukraine before making any deals with Moscow. “Please, before any decisions, come to see the civilians, warriors, hospitals, and children destroyed or dead,” he pleaded.

The Kremlin has been cautiously optimistic, calling the recent diplomatic contacts with the US “positive,” but admitting there are no concrete agreements yet.

As the conflict enters its third year, Trump’s rhetoric and diplomatic approach continue to stir concern among Ukraine’s allies, while civilian casualties in the war zone remain tragically high.

Zelensky Accuses Russia of Recruiting Chinese Citizens for War in Ukraine

admin staff

-

April 11, 2025

0

Zelensky Accuses Russia of Recruiting Chinese Citizens for War in Ukraine

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of systematically recruiting Chinese nationals to fight in the ongoing war in Ukraine. Speaking publicly on Thursday, he claimed more than 150 Chinese fighters are currently operating alongside Russian forces.

This accusation follows the capture of two Chinese citizens in the conflict-ravaged Donetsk region. Zelensky said the detentions are part of a larger trend of “systematic Russian efforts” to recruit individuals from China and other countries to bolster its war efforts.

“It is crystal clear that these are not isolated cases,” he said in a post shared on social media. He accompanied the message with a video showing an interrogation of one of the captured individuals, underlining the urgency of preventing Russia from prolonging and expanding the war through foreign recruitment.

Beijing responded sharply to the allegations, warning Ukraine and its allies against making what it called “irresponsible remarks.” Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian reiterated China’s stance as a neutral party, committed to a peaceful resolution of the conflict.

“China is not the initiator of the Ukrainian crisis, nor is China a participating party,” Lin said. “We urge the relevant parties to understand China’s role correctly and soberly.”

During a press conference with Belgian Prime Minister Bart de Wever, Zelensky also mentioned that Ukraine is investigating whether these Chinese recruits had any backing or direction from Chinese authorities. He speculated that the recruitment may have taken place through social media channels.

The Kremlin, however, backed Beijing’s stance. “China is our strategic partner, friend, and comrade,” said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov. “Zelensky is wrong.”

Keith Kellogg, a special envoy under Donald Trump, expressed skepticism about the allegations. Speaking at Georgetown University, he said he believes the captured individuals may be mercenaries or volunteers rather than official recruits.

“There’s an axiom in the military—the first report is always wrong,” Kellogg said. He also highlighted that Ukraine has international volunteers, including Americans, fighting in its defense.

This new point of tension unfolds as 30 nations gathered at NATO headquarters in Brussels to discuss the deployment of troops in Ukraine should a peace agreement be reached. British defence minister John Healey, who opened the session, stressed the urgency of ramping up pressure on Russia to bring the war to an end.

China is not backing down from Trump’s tariff war. What next?

admin staff

-

April 8, 2025

0

China is not backing down from Trump’s tariff war. What next?

Background of the US-China Trade War

The US-China trade war didn’t start overnight. It has been simmering for years, rooted in a complex web of trade imbalances, intellectual property disputes, and national security concerns. During his first term, Donald Trump launched a series of aggressive tariffs targeting Chinese goods, accusing Beijing of unfair trade practices.

What began as a strategy to balance the massive US-China trade deficit soon evolved into a prolonged economic duel, with both sides imposing reciprocal tariffs. Despite occasional pauses and phase-one agreements, the rivalry never truly ceased. Trump’s return to the White House reignited the fire, and this time, the blaze is fiercer.

Trump’s Latest Tariff Threats Explained

President Trump’s recent escalation could push tariffs on Chinese imports up to a staggering 104%, nearly doubling the current rate. These proposed duties are aimed at critical Chinese exports such as:

Smartphones and computers
Lithium-ion batteries
Toys and video game consoles
Machinery and hardware components

The move is intended to pressure China into changing its trade behaviors. But with implementation set for Wednesday, global markets are on edge. Businesses and consumers alike are scrambling to brace for the ripple effects.

China’s Immediate Response

China hasn’t sat idle. Within hours of Trump’s announcement, Beijing struck back with tit-for-tat tariffs reaching 34%, targeting major US exports. But this time, China’s playbook seems broader:

Currency manipulation: Letting the yuan weaken, making Chinese goods cheaper abroad.
State intervention: Chinese state-linked companies are stabilizing markets by buying up stocks.
Industrial retaliation: Initiating anti-monopoly probes on US giants like Google.

China’s stance is firm: it will not cave in to pressure, especially under threats. Doing so, experts say, would compromise its sovereignty and bargaining power.

Impact on Global Markets

Markets hate uncertainty—and there’s been plenty. The recent announcements triggered one of the worst stock market plunges in Asia in decades. On Monday, the Shanghai Composite fell more than 7%, while other regional indices also saw steep drops.

Tuesday brought mild relief as investors hoped for potential talks between the US and Japan, but fear still lingers. The looming tariffs risk choking global supply chains, driving up prices, and stifling growth, especially in emerging markets closely tied to Chinese exports.

Strategic Measures by China

China is digging in with long-term tactics:

Rare earth export controls to disrupt US tech production
Regulatory crackdowns on American firms operating in China
Internal market reforms to boost domestic consumption and lessen export reliance

These steps show China is not just reacting but preparing for a sustained economic standoff.

Economic Pressures on China

China’s economy, already strained by:

A prolonged property crisis
Rising youth unemployment
Heavily indebted local governments

…is under additional stress. These tariffs worsen the situation by squeezing export-driven revenues, a major pillar of China’s growth.

Beijing is countering with policies aimed at strengthening high-tech industries and stimulating local consumption, but these efforts take time to bear fruit.

Pain on Both Sides: US and China

The tariff war is no zero-sum game. In 2024, the US imported $438 billion worth of Chinese goods, while exporting just $143 billion, leaving a massive trade deficit. But this dependency cuts both ways.

American companies rely heavily on Chinese suppliers, and the sudden tax hikes make it hard to find affordable alternatives. Consumers will feel the pinch in the form of pricier goods—from electronics to household basics.

Repercussions for US Consumers and Businesses

Tariffs are taxes, and they’re passed on to the end-user. American families could soon see:

Higher prices for smartphones, laptops, and electric vehicles
Shortages of essential components in manufacturing
Reduced earnings for companies reliant on Chinese production

Small and medium enterprises, which lack the financial muscle to absorb added costs, could be especially hard-hit.

Tariffs on Third-Party Countries

Trump’s tariff net isn’t just targeting China. Vietnam, Cambodia, and other Southeast Asian countries now face duties up to 46-49%. Many global manufacturers who had shifted operations from China to these countries are once again under pressure.

This could trigger a domino effect, reshuffling global supply chains and prompting countries to seek out new trade partners or strengthen regional trade pacts.

Long-Term Implications for Global Trade

We’re entering a new era of economic nationalism and protectionism. The rise in tariffs may:

Accelerate the decoupling of US-China supply chains
Drive investments into local manufacturing and friend-shoring
Encourage nations to diversify trade to reduce dependency on major powers

For businesses and investors, adaptability will be key.

What Are Tariffs and Why Do They Matter?

At their core, tariffs are taxes imposed on imports to:

Protect domestic industries
Reduce trade deficits
Leverage negotiations

However, they often lead to higher prices, retaliatory measures, and disrupted supply chains—creating more losers than winners in the short term.

Possible Negotiation Scenarios

Though tensions are high, diplomacy isn’t off the table. Possibilities include:

Private backchannel talks between aides
A potential summit between Trump and Xi
Intervention from neutral global trade partners

Success would likely involve mutual concessions—something neither side seems ready for.

Risks of Full-Blown Trade War Escalation

If the tariff tit-for-tat continues unchecked, expect:

Complete decoupling of US-China tech ecosystems
Digital trade and data flow restrictions
A currency war as both nations manipulate exchange rates

The consequences could spill into geopolitical conflicts and realign global alliances.

The Role of Multilateral Institutions

Organizations like the WTO and G20 face renewed relevance:

WTO can mediate but lacks enforcement teeth
G20 summits may offer informal diplomacy avenues
Regional trade blocs (like RCEP) could gain strength as alternatives to US-China channels

Public Sentiment and Political Repercussions

Both leaders have domestic audiences to appease. In China, nationalism runs high, and retreat is politically costly. In the US, Trump is betting on economic toughness to rally voters.

But if the tariffs start biting too hard, the backlash could reshape election outcomes and shift public opinion against aggressive trade policies.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why is China refusing to back down?
China views unilateral tariff removal as a sign of weakness and a loss of sovereignty. It prefers a negotiated, equal-footing resolution.

2. How do tariffs affect everyday consumers?
Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which often translates to higher prices for consumers on items like electronics, clothing, and vehicles.

3. Can the US replace Chinese imports easily?
Not quickly. China’s manufacturing scale and infrastructure are difficult to replicate, especially in the short term.

4. What sectors are most affected?
Technology, consumer electronics, automotive, toys, and machinery face the most immediate pressure.

5. Are there winners in a trade war?
Some domestic manufacturers may benefit temporarily, but overall, trade wars typically result in economic slowdowns and market volatility.

6. Could this escalate into a broader conflict?
If left unchecked, economic tension could bleed into technology bans, sanctions, and even military posturing.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead

The current standoff between the US and China is more than a dispute over tariffs—it’s a clash of ideologies, economies, and global visions. While negotiations may still be possible, the tone has shifted from cooperation to confrontation.

The world is watching, markets are trembling, and businesses are bracing for impact. Whether this ends in compromise or catastrophe depends on decisions made in the next few critical weeks.

Elon Musk’s X Cracks Down on Parody Accounts with Stricter New Rules

Entertainment

admin staff

-

April 7, 2025

0

Elon Musk’s X Cracks Down on Parody Accounts with Stricter New Rules

X Tightens Rules to Combat Impersonation and User Confusion

Social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, is implementing stricter policies for parody and impersonation accounts. Beginning April 10, the platform will require users running such accounts to include the words “fake” or “parody” at the start of their account names, marking a significant shift in its approach to combating impersonation.

Additionally, these accounts will no longer be allowed to use identical profile images to those they are imitating. This includes individuals, organizations, or public figures—most notably, X owner Elon Musk, who has frequently been the target of parody and fake profiles.

Clearer Identification for Parody, Fan, and Commentary Accounts

X confirmed the new policy in a post over the weekend, stating that the changes aim to reduce confusion for users and distinguish unaffiliated or “PCF” (parody, commentary, fan) accounts from authentic ones.

“These changes are designed to help users better understand the unaffiliated nature of PCF accounts and reduce the risk of confusion or impersonation,” the company noted.

X is urging all affected accounts to update their profiles before the enforcement date to avoid penalties, which could include account suspensions or bans.

The update also applies to fan and commentary accounts, many of which currently include disclaimers in their bios or at the end of usernames. However, X says these measures are often insufficient, particularly when usernames are truncated in replies or feeds.

Public Reaction and Persistent Problems with Fake Accounts

The announcement has been met with support from users who have long complained about the abundance of impersonation accounts on the platform.

“Hopefully this includes all the thousands of fake variations of Elon Musk accounts,” one user commented.

“About time, I get a fake Elon account contacting me almost once a week,” another wrote in response to the policy update.

Elon Musk parody accounts often range from light-hearted humor to misleading posts promoting cryptocurrency scams or car giveaways. One recent parody post—posing as Musk and boasting over one million followers—offered users the chance to win a Tesla by liking and commenting. The post received more than 428,000 likes and over 200,000 replies, underscoring the reach and influence of these accounts.

Previous Efforts and Regulatory Scrutiny

X previously introduced parody labels in January, extending its rules around impersonation for entertainment purposes. However, critics argue the current labeling system—along with the blue check verification program—is not robust enough to prevent user deception.

Concerns escalated in July 2024, when the European Union criticized the blue tick system, warning that “verified” impersonators could mislead users in violation of EU online content regulations. Elon Musk dismissed those claims, calling the EU’s stance “misinformation.”

Musk has consistently reiterated that unlabelled impersonation will result in bans, a policy introduced shortly after his acquisition of the platform in November 2022.

Yet, many parody accounts still slip through the cracks. For example, if a parody name is too long and is shortened in replies, users may not notice the parody tag—especially if the profile image mirrors that of the genuine individual.

Looking Ahead

The stricter rules signal a new phase in X’s strategy to safeguard platform integrity while balancing free expression. With the April 10 deadline approaching, parody account holders must take action or risk enforcement.

As impersonation concerns persist across social media, X’s new policy may set a precedent for how platforms address misleading content while preserving satire and commentary.

Trump Tariffs Latest: UK Braces for ‘Liberation Day’ Trade War Chaos

World

admin staff

-

April 2, 2025

0

Trump Tariffs Latest: UK Braces for ‘Liberation Day’ Trade War Chaos

The global economy is on edge as Donald Trump prepares to unveil sweeping tariffs on nations he claims “treat the US unfairly.” The announcement, set for today, has already rattled financial markets, with fears of escalating trade tensions.

Stock Markets React to Uncertainty

Asian and European markets faltered on Wednesday as investors braced for the impact of Trump’s tariffs.
Germany’s DAX dropped 0.8%, marking the biggest decline.
The UK’s FTSE100 fell 0.3% in early trading, reflecting uncertainty in the financial sector.

Immediate Economic Fallout

The White House confirmed that reciprocal tariffs will be enforced immediately on countries imposing duties on US goods. In addition, a 25% tariff on auto imports is set to take effect on April 3.

UK Faces Potential Job Losses

The leading think-tank IPPR has warned that Trump’s tariffs could severely disrupt the UK car manufacturing industry, putting 25,000 British jobs at risk.

What’s Next?

As Trump unveils the full scope of his tariff plan, world leaders and financial analysts will be closely watching. With fears of a full-scale trade war, global economies must prepare for potential long-term consequences.

Trump’s ‘Dirty 15’ Tariffs: Some Countries Face Bigger Trade Hits

World

admin staff

-

April 1, 2025

0

Trump’s ‘Dirty 15’ Tariffs: Some Countries Face Bigger Trade Hits

Key Takeaways:

President Trump is set to introduce “reciprocal tariffs” targeting countries that impose duties or trade barriers on U.S. goods.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent identified a “Dirty 15”—countries that heavily trade with the U.S. while imposing high tariffs.
These new tariffs will add to a series of trade restrictions Trump has already implemented.

Major Trade Partners Brace for New Tariffs

President Donald Trump is preparing to roll out his most extensive set of tariffs yet, escalating tensions with key U.S. trade partners. While details remain unclear, one thing is certain—some countries will bear the brunt more than others.

Trump has dubbed April 3 as America’s “liberation day”, when he will announce “reciprocal tariffs” on nations that impose duties on U.S. exports or enforce other trade barriers. The full scope of the plan remains uncertain, including the exact list of affected countries and how tariff rates will be determined.

Though Trump frames the move as an effort to rebalance trade, some in his administration suggest a more targeted approach, focusing on the worst offenders.

Who Are the ‘Dirty 15’?

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently introduced the term “Dirty 15”, referring to the 15% of nations that dominate U.S. trade while maintaining high tariffs and non-tariff barriers against American goods. However, he did not disclose specific country names.

Kevin Hassett, director of Trump’s National Economic Council, further hinted that the administration is considering tariffs on 10 to 15 countries responsible for the entire U.S. trade deficit, which exceeds $1 trillion.

Commerce Department data from 2024 reveals that the U.S. had its highest goods trade deficits with China, the European Union, Mexico, Vietnam, Ireland, Germany, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Canada, India, Thailand, Italy, Switzerland, Malaysia, Indonesia, France, Austria, and Sweden.

Countries Under Scrutiny

The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) recently published a list of 21 countries being reviewed for unfair trade practices, including:

Major economies in the G20, such as China, India, Japan, and the European Union.
Other key trading nations, including Mexico, Canada, Australia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.

Despite these targeted assessments, Trump hinted on Air Force One that tariffs may apply to all countries, rejecting the idea of a narrow focus on 10 or 15 nations. “You’d start with all countries,” he said, emphasizing that there is “no cut-off” point.

Economic Impact and Ongoing Tariff Policies

The new tariffs will add to an already aggressive trade policy, which includes:

Broad tariffs on China, covering a wide range of imports.
Higher duties on Canadian and Mexican goods that fail to meet existing trade agreements.
Steel and aluminum tariffs, affecting global suppliers.
Automobile import tariffs, which experts warn could drive up car prices significantly.

Trump has also hinted at future tariffs on pharmaceuticals and other key industries, signaling continued trade restrictions.

While Trump argues these measures are necessary to protect American businesses from unfair foreign competition, economists warn that trade deficits are not inherently negative—they often reflect strong U.S. consumer demand for cheaper imported goods.

With global markets on edge, the world is watching closely to see just how far Trump’s tariff war will go.

Meghan introduces new label for her jams and lifestyle range

Business

admin staff

-

February 20, 2025

0

Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, has revealed a new name for her lifestyle brand, now called As Ever. Despite earlier social media teasers featuring celebrities with jars of jam from Meghan, the previous brand name, American Riviera Orchard, seems to have come to an end.

In a social media post, Meghan shared that the newly named product line will be a collaborative project with Netflix, which is set to premiere her cooking and lifestyle series, With Love, Meghan, next month.

“‘As ever’ means ‘as it’s always been,’ or some even say ‘in the same way as always,'” Meghan explained in her post. The message, filmed in a close-up shot, underscores the connection to her earlier pre-royal lifestyle blog, The Tig. Meghan noted that the new venture would seamlessly combine everything she loves: food, gardening, entertaining, mindful living, and finding joy in everyday life.

Prince Harry, currently attending the Invictus Games in Canada, can be heard briefly off-camera during the recording of the Instagram post, while their three-year-old daughter, Lilibet, is seen in the distance, set against a sunny Pacific backdrop on the As Ever website.

The former brand name, American Riviera Orchard, had referenced the area of California where Meghan and Prince Harry live. Meghan explained that it “limited me to things which were manufactured and grown in this area.” The name had been used since April 2024, when celebrities began posting pictures of jars of strawberry jam on Instagram as part of a launch that aimed to maintain an air of mystery.

However, reports suggested delays due to trademark issues with the original name. If this latest announcement signals a new jam rivalry, the Californian contender will be competing with the likes of Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle Strawberry Preserve, priced at £7, as well as Highgrove Organic Preserve at £6.95.

The As Ever brand will be a partnership with Netflix, which, according to reports, plans to open retail stores selling merchandise related to its shows.

“Of course, there will be fruit preserves. I think we’re all clear at this point that jam is my jam,” Meghan joked. “But there are so many more products that I just love and use in my home. Now it’s time to share them with you, and I can’t wait for you to see it.”

The debut of Meghan’s TV series was delayed due to wildfires in California, which serve as the backdrop for the series. The show is expected to feature a blend of cooking, hosting tips, and celebrity guests, and will be available on Netflix starting March 4.

It has been five years since Meghan and Prince Harry stepped down as working royals and became financially independent in the United States. Meghan expressed in her post that she has “poured my heart into” this new product line.

Public opinion on Meghan is divided, with strong reactions from both supporters and critics. Her fans have praised her creativity and independence, while her detractors have dismissed the brand as “whatever.”

In her signature style, Meghan closed the post with: “As ever, Meghan.”

Collagen Supplements: Key to Flawless Skin or Just Marketing Hype?

Lifestyle

admin staff

-

February 18, 2025

0

Collagen Supplements: Key to Flawless Skin or Just Marketing Hype?

Collagen supplements have become highly popular, with claims that they can boost skin elasticity and provide benefits for everything from wrinkles to sleep. As the body ages, collagen production naturally slows, leading many to turn to supplements in hopes of counteracting this decline. Tech entrepreneur Bryan Johnson, for instance, takes 25 grams of collagen peptides daily as part of his anti-aging regimen. But while collagen is important for skin and joint structure, the evidence supporting its supplementation is still limited, and some argue that it might be more about marketing than proven benefits.

Understanding Collagen

Collagen, found in animal connective tissue, is an abundant protein essential for skin and joint health. Most collagen products derive from cows, pigs, chickens, or fish, with plant-based alternatives offering collagen-boosting ingredients like vitamin C and amino acids, not actual collagen. Hydrolyzed collagen (broken into peptides) is commonly used in supplements, as it’s thought to be better absorbed by the body than undenatured (raw) collagen, which is found in cartilage. There are various forms of collagen supplements available, from powders to bars, with powder or liquid forms being more effective than gummies or tablets.

Scientific Scrutiny Despite the marketing hype, many of the claims about collagen’s effectiveness don’t hold up to scientific scrutiny. In the European Union, health claims for collagen supplements have been rejected due to insufficient evidence, and studies supporting benefits like improved skin elasticity or joint function have been largely inconclusive. Additionally, many studies are funded by the supplement industry, raising concerns about potential bias.

Collagen and Digestion When collagen is ingested, it is broken down into amino acids in the stomach, making it difficult to guarantee that it will directly benefit the skin or joints. While some research shows that collagen peptides may improve skin hydration and elasticity, much of the evidence is weak and inconclusive. Moreover, many dermatology studies on collagen products also include other beneficial ingredients, making it hard to isolate the effects of collagen alone.

The Role of Exercise Research suggests that combining collagen supplementation with exercise might enhance its effects. A study by Robert Erskine, a neuromuscular physiology expert, found that consuming collagen before high-intensity resistance exercise increased collagen production in the body. This could potentially strengthen tendons and improve overall joint health.

Collagen for Aging Although collagen supplements are commonly marketed to younger individuals or those concerned with appearance, they are being explored as potential treatments for age-related conditions like osteoarthritis. Some studies indicate that collagen supplementation can reduce osteoarthritis-related pain, but the overall evidence is still limited.

Should You Take Collagen? While collagen supplementation is generally considered safe, it’s important to be mindful of possible interactions with other medications, especially for individuals with kidney or liver conditions. Experts like David Hunter suggest that anyone considering collagen should consult with a healthcare professional. Additionally, collagen may not deliver immediate results, and it’s worth considering whether other lifestyle factors—such as a balanced diet, exercise, and adequate sleep—could achieve similar benefits without the need for supplements.

Ultimately, spending large sums on collagen might be better invested in a nutritious, well-rounded diet, which can offer multiple health benefits.

Conclave and The Brutalist score major wins at the BAFTAs

Entertainment

admin staff

-

February 17, 2025

0

Conclave and The Brutalist score major wins at the BAFTAs

At the BAFTA Film Awards on Sunday, Conclave, a drama about cardinals electing a new pope, and The Brutalist, an immigration epic, were the big winners. Conclave, directed by German filmmaker Edward Berger, took home four awards, including Best Film and Best British Film—the first time a movie has won both in the same year since 1917 in 2019. The film also won Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Editing.

The Brutalist, directed by US filmmaker Brady Corbet, also claimed four awards. Corbet won Best Director, and Adrien Brody earned Best Actor for his portrayal of László Tóth, a Hungarian architect and Holocaust survivor. The film also won Best Original Score and Best Cinematography.

Other notable winners included Mikey Madison, who won Best Actress for her role in Anora, Kieran Culkin for Best Supporting Actor in A Real Pain, and Zoe Saldaña for Best Supporting Actress in Emilia Pérez. Anora, a film about a New York stripper’s romance with the son of a Russian oligarch, had been gaining momentum ahead of the Oscars, but instead of winning Best Picture, it walked away with Best Actress and Best Casting. Madison, who was surprised by her win, took the opportunity to recognize the sex worker community, pledging to be an ally and advocate for their rights.

Demi Moore, who had been favored to win Best Actress for her role in The Substance, ultimately did not take home the prize. The film, a body-horror drama about a woman using black-market drugs to regain youth, won only one award—Best Make-Up and Hair. Moore remains a strong contender at the upcoming Oscars.

The awards ceremony, hosted by David Tennant at London’s Royal Festival Hall, saw no single film dominating, reflecting the unpredictable nature of this year’s awards season. In a repeat of last year, no British actors won any of the four acting categories. Notably, films like A Complete Unknown, Nosferatu, Blitz, Gladiator II, and The Apprentice had multiple nominations but did not win.

Emilia Pérez, a French film about a Mexican drug lord transitioning into a new life as a woman, won Best International Film despite recent controversy surrounding the star, Karla Sofía Gascón, whose offensive social media posts surfaced prior to the ceremony. Emilia Pérez also garnered attention with Zoe Saldaña’s win, adding to its momentum heading into the Oscars.

In other categories, Kieran Culkin won Best Supporting Actor for A Real Pain, a film by Jesse Eisenberg, which also took home Best Original Screenplay. Dune: Part 2 won awards for Best Special Effects and Best Sound, while Wicked earned Best Production Design and Best Costume Design.

Aardman’s Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl won Best Animation, and the film also took home the first-ever award for Best Children’s and Family Film. Kneecap, a semi-fictionalized account of an Irish rap group, won Best Debut by a British Writer, Director, or Producer.

The evening also saw a tribute to those lost in the film community over the past year, including Dame Maggie Smith, James Earl Jones, and Donald Sutherland.

In addition to the awards, Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story won Best Documentary, with the late actor’s children accepting the award on his behalf.

This year’s BAFTA winners reflect the diversity of storytelling across different genres, with no clear frontrunner emerging, leaving much anticipation for the upcoming Oscars.

TikTok makes its return to the Apple and Google app stores in the US

admin staff

-

February 14, 2025

0

TikTok makes its return to the Apple and Google app stores in the US

TikTok has returned to the Apple and Google app stores in the US after President Donald Trump delayed the enforcement of a ban on the Chinese-owned social media platform until April 5. The app, used by over 170 million American users, was briefly removed last month as the ban deadline approached. However, Trump signed an executive order granting TikTok a 75-day extension to comply with a law mandating the app’s sale to avoid a ban.

According to Bloomberg, which first reported TikTok’s return, the decision followed assurances from the Trump administration to Apple and Google that they wouldn’t face liability for allowing downloads, and that the ban wouldn’t be enforced immediately. The law, which passed with bipartisan support in Congress, requires TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sell its US operations to a neutral party. This move aims to prevent a complete ban, which the Biden administration argued was necessary due to concerns TikTok could be used for espionage or political manipulation by China. Both China and TikTok have denied these accusations, and Beijing has rejected calls for the sale of TikTok’s US operations.

The ban had broad support among US lawmakers and was upheld by the Supreme Court. While Trump initially supported a ban on TikTok during his first term, he softened his stance during the 2020 election campaign, highlighting the app’s success in attracting millions of views for his campaign videos. When TikTok resumed in the US last month, a pop-up message appeared, thanking Trump by name.

TikTok CEO Shou Chew met with Trump after his 2020 election victory and attended his inauguration. Trump has expressed a desire to find a compromise with ByteDance, suggesting a joint ownership model, where half of the company would go to the US. He also mentioned being open to selling the app to figures like Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison or billionaire Elon Musk, who was involved with the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency.

Other names associated with the potential purchase of TikTok have included billionaire Frank McCourt and Canadian businessman Kevin O’Leary, a celebrity investor on Shark Tank. Most recently, YouTube star Jimmy “MrBeast” Donaldson revealed that he was also in talks to acquire the app, after receiving interest from investors following his social media posts expressing interest in the purchase.

Trump announces no exemptions for metal tariffs set to begin in March

World

admin staff

-

February 12, 2025

0

Trump announces no exemptions for metal tariffs set to begin in March

European and Canadian leaders have vowed to challenge Donald Trump’s plans to impose tariffs on their steel and aluminum exports. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that the move would trigger “firm and proportionate countermeasures,” while Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pledged to “stand up for” Canadian workers and businesses.

This followed Trump’s announcement of a 25% import tax on all steel and aluminum entering the U.S., ending previous exemptions for allies like Canada and the EU, marking a major expansion of trade barriers. Trump defended the move, saying it would “simplify” rules and boost domestic production, adding, “This is a big deal, the beginning of making America rich again.” He emphasized the need for U.S.-made steel and aluminum, with the new measures set to take effect on March 12.

The U.S. is the world’s largest importer of steel, with Canada, Brazil, and Mexico as its top suppliers. Last year, Canada accounted for over 50% of aluminum imports into the U.S. These tariffs will raise costs for U.S. businesses that rely on imports, sparking concern that it will make selling products in the U.S. more expensive for many companies globally. If the tariffs are enforced as planned, Canada is expected to be hit hardest.

Trudeau called the tariffs “unacceptable,” expressing hope that talks with the Trump administration would resolve the issue without retaliation. However, he warned, “If it comes to that, our response will be firm and clear.” Von der Leyen echoed similar concerns, stating that the EU would respond with countermeasures, emphasizing that tariffs are bad for business and consumers.

Other leaders, including Mexico’s economy minister, criticized the tariffs as unjustified but stopped short of announcing retaliation plans. South Korea’s acting president said the country would work to maintain a strong relationship with the Trump administration.

The announcement saw shares of U.S. steelmakers rise, with Cleveland-Cliffs’ price jumping nearly 20%. Prices for steel and aluminum also climbed, while the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso fell. However, the broader market response was muted, with some questioning whether the tariffs are a negotiation tactic or a serious move by Trump, given his history of delaying or negotiating exemptions.

“This is a replay of 2018,” said Dartmouth College economics professor Douglas Irwin, referring to Trump’s previous tariffs on steel and aluminum. In 2018, Trump imposed 25% tariffs on steel and 15% on aluminum but later negotiated exemptions for countries like Canada and Mexico. Jane Foley of Rabobank suggested that the market is unsure if this is a bargaining tactic or if Trump intends to push the tariffs through.

Last week, Trump also delayed a 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican products for 30 days and imposed new 10% tariffs on Chinese goods, prompting retaliation from China.

The tariffs are central to Trump’s economic vision, which he believes will protect jobs and boost the U.S. economy by encouraging domestic production. However, there are concerns about rising costs for U.S. manufacturers that depend on steel and aluminum. Industry groups, from construction to can-makers, have warned about the impact.

When asked if tariffs could lead to higher prices for consumers, Trump insisted that they would ultimately lower costs, saying, “It’s time for our great industries to come back to America.” He also suggested that other tariffs could target pharmaceuticals and computer chips.

In his first term, Trump’s tariffs raised the average price of steel and aluminum in the U.S. by 2.4% and 1.6%, respectively, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission. Stephen Moore, an economist and former Trump campaign adviser, argued that the tariffs were not an effective job creation tool but more of a strategy to grab global attention.

Trump officials have indicated that the new measures are aimed at preventing countries like China and Russia from bypassing tariffs by funneling cheap products through other nations. New standards would require steel to be “melted and poured” and aluminum to be “smelted and cast” in North America.

Nick Iacovella, a spokesperson for the Coalition for a Prosperous America, noted that while Canada sends far more goods to the U.S. than it imports, the U.S. still faces trade imbalances with both Canada and Mexico, which Trump has repeatedly criticized. “There are still imbalances with the Canadian and United States trading relationship that should be addressed,” Iacovella said.

Google lifts its ban on using AI for weapons

Business

admin staff

-

February 5, 2025

0

Google lifts its ban on using AI for weapons

Alphabet, Google’s parent company, has lifted its ban on using artificial intelligence (AI) for the development of weapons and surveillance technologies, revising its long-standing policies. The company updated its guidelines on AI use, removing a section that previously prohibited applications deemed “likely to cause harm.”

In a blog post, Google defended this decision, emphasizing the need for collaboration between businesses and democratic governments to create AI systems that enhance national security. The company stated, “We believe democracies should lead in AI development, guided by core values like freedom, equality, and respect for human rights. Companies, governments, and organizations sharing these values should work together to create AI that protects people, promotes global growth, and supports national security.”

This change comes amid ongoing debates among AI experts about the governance of the technology, its commercialization, and how to mitigate potential risks to humanity. Controversy surrounds the use of AI in warfare and surveillance, with concerns about its ethical implications.

The blog post, written by senior vice president James Manyika and Demis Hassabis, head of Google DeepMind, explained that the company’s original AI principles, introduced in 2018, required updating due to the rapid evolution of AI technology. “AI has become a general-purpose technology, integral to everyday life for billions of people,” they wrote. “It has moved from a niche research topic to a platform as pervasive as mobile phones and the internet.”

As a result, Alphabet is working on baseline AI principles to guide strategies for the technology’s use across industries.

Initially, Google’s founders, Sergei Brin and Larry Page, adopted the “don’t be evil” motto for the company, later evolving to “Do the right thing” when Alphabet was formed in 2015. This shift came after internal pushback against the company’s direction, including in 2018, when Google decided not to renew an AI contract with the US Pentagon following employee resignations and a petition over concerns about “Project Maven,” which many believed would lead to the use of AI for lethal purposes.

The blog post was published shortly before Alphabet’s financial report, which showed weaker-than-expected results, impacting its share price. However, the company reported a 10% increase in revenue from digital advertising, driven by US election spending. Alphabet also announced plans to invest $75 billion in AI projects this year, a 29% increase over previous expectations, focusing on AI infrastructure, research, and applications like AI-powered search.

Mexico urges Google Maps not to rename the Gulf of Mexico

admin

-

January 31, 2025

0

Mexico urges Google Maps not to rename the Gulf of Mexico

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has written to Google urging the company to reconsider its decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico. The move follows an executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump during his first week in office, which mandates that the body of water—bordered by the U.S., Cuba, and Mexico—be called the “Gulf of America” on U.S. maps.

The new name will only appear on Google Maps for users in the U.S., while the rest of the world will continue using the Gulf’s traditional name, which has been in use for centuries. However, Mexico argues that the U.S. cannot legally rename the Gulf, citing the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which asserts that a country’s sovereignty extends only 12 nautical miles from its coastline. Sheinbaum stated, “The name change could only apply within the 12 nautical miles off the U.S. coast.”

Google has yet to comment on the matter, but in a social media statement on Monday, the company said, “We have a longstanding practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.” It also mentioned plans to rename Mount Denali as Mount McKinley in the U.S. in line with another directive from Trump. “When official names vary between countries, Maps users see their official local name,” the company added.

Sheinbaum criticized Google’s decision, arguing that the company should not comply with a single nation’s request to rename an internationally recognized sea. She also humorously suggested that Mexico might request other changes, including renaming the U.S. as “Mexican America.” She had previously joked that she might consider renaming North America as “América Mexicana” within Mexico.

“When Trump says he will call it the Gulf of America on the continental shelf, we still call it the Gulf of Mexico,” Sheinbaum remarked. “And for the entire world, it will remain the Gulf of Mexico.”

Selena Gomez fires back at politician who urged for her deportation over her support for migrants

Entertainment

admin staff

-

January 28, 2025

0

Selena Gomez fires back at politician who urged for her deportation over her support for migrants

Selena Gomez responded to U.S. Senate candidate Sam Parker after he called for her deportation due to her support for Mexican migrants. The 32-year-old singer posted an emotional video expressing her sorrow over recent ICE raids, which led to 956 arrests in major U.S. cities. In the now-deleted Instagram post, she tearfully apologized, saying, “All my people are getting attacked… The children. I don’t understand. I’m so sorry, I wish I could do something but I can’t.” She added, “I’ll try everything, I promise,” captioning the video with a Mexican flag emoji.

The post, which was quickly deleted, sparked backlash from Trump supporters, including Parker, who criticized Gomez’s sympathy for undocumented immigrants. Parker, in a series of posts on X/Twitter, said, “Deport Selena Gomez,” claiming she favored “illegals over America” due to her family’s history of crossing the border from Mexico. Gomez, whose family gained U.S. citizenship after initially being undocumented, produced a 2019 documentary titled Living Undocumented, reflecting on her personal connection to immigration issues.

Gomez swiftly hit back at Parker, responding on Instagram, “Oh Mr Parker, Mr Parker. Thanks for the laugh and the threat.” Parker, seemingly pleased by the attention, responded in a now-deleted post, saying, “Inject their tears into my VEINS. I dragged Selena Gomez pretty hard today.” He added, “American Nationalism is back. With a little boost from Selena Gomez.”

In her 2019 essay for Time, Gomez shared her perspective on immigration, acknowledging the privilege of being born in the U.S. and expressing concern for those in similar situations. “I feel afraid for my country,” she wrote, emphasizing the importance of remembering that the U.S. was built by immigrants.

Expert advice on who should (and shouldn’t) apply coffee to their skin

Lifestyle

admin staff

-

January 24, 2025

0

Expert advice on who should (and shouldn’t) apply coffee to their skin

Who doesn’t love a quick and easy skincare hack that promises great results? The internet is filled with them, but it’s important to be cautious before trying something new. One popular trend is the application of coffee powder or granules directly to the skin, regardless of skin type. Many influencers swear by it as a remedy for dark circles and an exfoliator to brighten tanned skin. But do these claims hold up? We turned to a dermatologist to get the facts.

Why Coffee is Used in Skincare Products

Dr. Shareefa Chause, a dermatologist and cosmetologist at Shareefa’s Skin Care Clinic, explains that coffee has become an important ingredient in many skincare products, from sunscreen to under-eye creams. “Not only is it used in drinks, but it also has high value in dermatological and cosmetological products,” says Dr. Chause.

According to Healthline, coffee’s chlorogenic acid and melanoidins may help reduce the appearance of sunspots, redness, and fine lines due to their anti-inflammatory properties.

Who Should Be Cautious?

While coffee, with its caffeine content, may offer benefits like UV protection and wound healing, Dr. Chause warns that overuse can lead to collagen loss. “People with dry or sensitive skin should avoid applying caffeine-based products, as it can cause irritation,” she notes. Overuse can lead to skin problems like redness, breakouts, and acne. In particular, applying coffee directly to the face can lead to dryness under the eyes or even micro-tears in some cases. People with sensitive skin may experience rashes, burning sensations, or itching.

Another issue is coffee’s pH level. “Coffee has a specific pH that can disrupt the natural balance of your skin,” says Dr. Mandeep Singh, HOD of Plastic, Dermatology, and Cosmetic Surgery at Paras Health Gurugram. “Your skin’s pH balance is crucial for protecting against bacteria and environmental pollutants. Disrupting it can cause dryness, irritation, and increase the risk of skin infections.”

The Size of Coffee Granules Matters

Dr. Singh also points out that the granules in coffee can sometimes be too large, potentially clogging pores rather than providing a good exfoliating effect. “If the coffee is not finely ground, it can obstruct pores, leading to breakouts. This is especially problematic for those with oily or acne-prone skin,” he explains.

The Bottom Line

As with any skincare treatment, it’s important to be cautious when applying something new to your face, as it’s more sensitive than other areas of the body. “Always consult your doctor before trying new hacks or home remedies to avoid allergic reactions,” advises Dr. Chause.

England’s new era kicks off with a heavy defeat to India

Business

admin staff

-

January 23, 2025

0

England’s new era kicks off with a heavy defeat to India

England’s new era in white-ball cricket under Brendon McCullum got off to a disappointing start with a heavy defeat to world champions India in the first T20 in Kolkata, as familiar struggles against spin resurfaced.

After Arshdeep Singh dismissed Phil Salt for a three-ball duck and Ben Duckett in his first two overs, England’s middle order collapsed against India’s spinners, leaving them bowled out for just 132.

Captain Jos Buttler fought a lone battle, scoring 68 off 44 balls, while Harry Brook was the next highest scorer with 17. Brook was dismissed by the excellent Varun Chakravarthy in the eighth over, who then sent Liam Livingstone back for a duck two balls later as England’s innings stalled and wickets continued to fall.

Jacob Bethell struggled for seven off 14 balls, Jamie Overton managed only two at number seven, and Gus Atkinson was dismissed by Axar Patel for just two off 12 balls.

Chakravarthy returned to dismiss Buttler in the 17th over, ending England’s hopes of a strong finish as he claimed 3-23.

Jofra Archer impressed with 2-21 during India’s chase, but the hosts cruised to a seven-wicket victory with 43 balls to spare, marking England’s heaviest T20 defeat in terms of deliveries remaining.

Atkinson was costly, conceding 23 runs in the second over, and Abhishek Sharma smashed 79 off 34 balls, easing the pressure on India.

The second T20 in the five-match series takes place on Saturday in Chennai at 13:30 GMT.